अष्टावक्र उवाच॥ न ते संगोऽस्ति केनापि किं शुद्धस्त्यक्तुमिच्छसि। संघातविलयं कुर्वन्नेवमेव लयं व्रज॥५- १॥
aṣṭāvakra uvāca|| na te saṁgo'sti kenāpi kiṁ śuddhastyaktumicchasi| saṁghātavilayaṁ kurvannevameva layaṁ vraja||5- 1||
Ashtavakra said: You have no attachment with anything at all; being already pure, why do you wish to abandon anything? Simply dissolving the sense of the aggregate as yourself, go to dissolution in this very way.
Modern Reflection
Chapter 5, per the itx colophon ācāryokta-laya-catuṣṭayam, the teacher's four verses on dissolution, is the shortest chapter so far and the last in this five-chapter range, its four verses sharing the identical closing refrain evam eva layaṁ vraja, go to dissolution in this very way, a structural device (anaphora across an entire short chapter) rare even within this repetition-loving text. Ashtavakra resumes the teaching voice here after chapter 4's Janaka-testimony, and his first move is characteristically sharp: not offering a technique for achieving detachment, but pointing out that saṅga, attachment, was already absent, na te saṅgaḥ asti kenāpi, making the very question of what to renounce logically confused for someone already śuddhaḥ, pure, from the start. Indian commentaries on this opening move often compare it to a physician telling a perfectly healthy patient there is nothing to cure, a diagnosis that can feel, paradoxically, harder to accept than being told one is ill, since it removes the entire narrative of struggle and gradual improvement a sincere spiritual seeker has usually built an identity around.